An unusual custom-built sports car inspired by classic Aston Martin design has had its online auction abruptly canceled following a trademark dispute. The vehicle, a modified 2007 Mazda MX-5 Miata, had drawn mixed reactions before being removed from sale due to concerns over branding.
The car, created by Simpson Design, featured extensive bodywork intended to evoke the styling of vintage Aston Martin models. While the design aimed to reinterpret classic luxury aesthetics on a modern platform, the result sparked debate among enthusiasts over whether the transformation successfully captured the elegance of its inspiration.
Also read…
Bentley Confirms Debut of First Fully Electric Vehicle Later This Year
Leland Little Auctions Is Selling a Great Collection of Collector Automobiles April 29th
Win a Rare 1969 Pontiac GTO Judge in Matador Red: MCC Readers Get More Entries!
The listing appeared on Bring a Trailer, where it was described clearly as an Aston Martin-style Miata rather than an authentic vehicle from the British automaker. Despite that distinction, the car displayed Aston Martin badges, which ultimately led to legal complications. Shortly before the auction was set to close, the listing was withdrawn after a trademark claim was raised regarding the use of Aston Martin branding and how the vehicle was ներկայացed.
Platform officials opted to remove the auction rather than proceed amid unresolved legal concerns. The listing page was later taken down entirely, reflecting the seriousness of the issue. According to information shared during the process, the seller indicated that the badges were added independently and could be easily removed, as they were attached using non-permanent methods.
The situation highlights the challenges faced by custom car builders and sellers navigating intellectual property boundaries. While restomod and tribute builds have become increasingly common, companies in the space often avoid legal risk by carefully choosing how vehicles are described and by steering clear of unauthorized branding.
In this case, the designer associated with the build has previously advised clients against using manufacturer logos on custom projects, citing potential complications during resale. The seller echoed that the addition of the badges was not part of the original design intent.
It remains unclear whether the vehicle will return to auction in a revised form without the disputed branding. Discussions between the parties involved are ongoing as they seek a resolution that aligns with trademark requirements.
Eve Nowell